
Using
geophysics to map saltwater intrusion along a coastal river
In 1991 a small
water district wanted to drill a new water supply well in the bank of a coastal
river in northern
We preformed a
geophysical investigation using a combination of electrical resistivity and
seismic refraction. These techniques were chosen for their low cost and
usefulness in defining the expected targets. Saltwater is very electrically
conductive and is easily seen with electrical techniques. Electrical
resistivity was used to determine if the groundwater within the river bank was
brackish or fresh. Seismic refraction was used to determine the depth to the
water table and the depth to bedrock below the river bank. Combining the
results of the two techniques allowed us to determine the top of the water
table, the top of the saltwater intrusion and the thickness of the river
deposits.


We collected data
at eleven spots along the river. We chose spots where the bank was wide enough
to accommodate the instrument arrays used to collect the data. The first
location was near the mouth of the river where saltwater infiltration was
expected. The last location was approximately six miles up stream where fresh
water was expected. We used the first and last locations to calibrate the data
collected in between. Electrical data were collected using Schlumberger arrays
with outer electrode spacings to 1800 feet. Seismic refraction data were
collected using spreads 300 to 600 feet in length.
Sounding Locations
The results of the
data collected at one location are shown below. This location was slightly over
a mile from the river's mouth. The seismic data indicated three layers. The top
layer was from 8 to 20 feet thick and had a compressional (P) wave velocity of
950 feet per second (fps). The slow P-wave velocity suggested the top layer
consisted of partially saturated sediments. The middle seismic layer was from
35 to 110 feet thick and had a P-wave velocity of 5600 fps. The P-wave
velocity, 5600 fps, is typical of unconsolidated saturated sediments. The top
of the middle seismic layer corresponded to the top of the water table. The
lower layer 's P-wave velocity was 8800 fps. The P-wave velocity suggested the
lower layer was partially weathered bedrock.
Seimic and Resistivity Profile
The resistivity
data also showed three layers with resistivities of 110 Ohm-feet, 11 Ohm-feet
and 700 Ohm-feet, respectively. The upper layer resistivity, 110 Ohm-feet,
indicated sediments partially to fully saturated with fresh water. At a depth
of about 40 feet the resistivity dropped sharply to 11 Ohm-feet. This low value
indicated a layer of sediments saturated with brackish water. The third
resistivity layer corresponded to the bedrock beneath the river deposits.
From the
information provided by the seismic and resistivity data shown above, we were
able to determine the river sediments were 40 to 130 feet thick and the
thickest section was approximately 200 feet from the edge of the river. The
water table was 13 feet below grade and there was a 60-foot layer of brackish
water underlying a thin layer of fresh water. The data indicated that saltwater
had intruded the river bank and that this location would not produce fresh
water.
Below are the
results of the first nine soundings. The data showed the first five locations
were underlain with brackish water. The brackish water was again found at the
seventh location. Only fresh water was found after the eighth location.
Results from 9 Locations
The extent of the
salt water intrusion beneath the river bank is shown below. Wells drilled
within the green zone would encounter brackish water and would not be suitable
water supplies. Wells drilled upstream from the intrusion zone would encounter
fresh water. The initial location for the water well was scrapped because it
fell within the intruded zone. A new location away from the intrusion zone was
found. Our geophysical investigation saved the district tens of thousands of
dollars in exploratory drilling costs.
Zone of Saltwater Intrusion
Seismics and
resistivity are just two of many geophysical techniques offered by
J R Associates. Please contact us to discuss how our services could
benefit you.
J
R Associates, 1886 Emory Street, San Jose, CA 95126
Ph: (408) 293-7390 Fax: (408) 293-0121 Email:
jra@Greatgeophysics.com