
Using
geophysics to map saltwater intrusion along a coastal river
In 1991 a small
water district wanted to drill a new water supply well in the bank of a coastal
river in northern
We preformed a
geophysical investigation using a combination of electrical resistivity
and seismic refraction. These techniques were chosen for their low cost and
usefulness in defining the expected targets. Saltwater is very electrically
conductive and is easily seen with electrical techniques. Electrical resistivity was used to determine if the groundwater within
the river bank was brackish or fresh. Seismic refraction was used to determine
the depth to the water table and the depth to bedrock below the river bank.
Combining the results of the two techniques allowed us to determine the top of
the water table, the top of the saltwater intrusion and the thickness of the
river deposits.


We collected data
at eleven spots along the river. We chose spots where the bank was wide enough
to accommodate the instrument arrays used to collect the data. The first
location was near the mouth of the river where saltwater infiltration was
expected. The last location was approximately six miles up stream where fresh
water was expected. We used the first and last locations to calibrate the data
collected in between. Electrical data were collected using Schlumberger arrays with
outer electrode spacings to 1800 feet. Seismic
refraction data were collected using spreads 300 to 600 feet in length.
Sounding Locations
The results of the
data collected at one location are shown below. This location was slightly over
a mile from the river's mouth. The seismic data indicated three layers. The top
layer was from 8 to 20 feet thick and had a compressional
(P) wave velocity of 950 feet per second (fps). The slow P-wave velocity
suggested the top layer consisted of partially saturated sediments. The middle
seismic layer was from 35 to 110 feet thick and had a P-wave velocity of 5600
fps. The P-wave velocity, 5600 fps, is typical of unconsolidated saturated
sediments. The top of the middle seismic layer corresponded to the top of the
water table. The lower layer 's P-wave velocity was 8800 fps. The P-wave
velocity suggested the lower layer was partially weathered bedrock.
Seimic
and Resistivity Profile
The resistivity data also showed three layers with resistivities of 110 Ohm-feet, 11 Ohm-feet and 700
Ohm-feet, respectively. The upper layer resistivity,
110 Ohm-feet, indicated sediments partially to fully saturated with fresh
water. At a depth of about 40 feet the resistivity
dropped sharply to 11 Ohm-feet. This low value indicated a layer of sediments
saturated with brackish water. The third resistivity
layer corresponded to the bedrock beneath the river deposits.
From the
information provided by the seismic and resistivity
data shown above, we were able to determine the river sediments were 40 to 130
feet thick and the thickest section was approximately 200 feet from the edge of
the river. The water table was 13 feet below grade and there was a 60-foot
layer of brackish water underlying a thin layer of fresh water. The data
indicated that saltwater had intruded the river bank and that this location
would not produce fresh water.
Below are the
results of the first nine soundings. The data showed the first five locations
were underlain with brackish water. The brackish water was again found at the
seventh location. Only fresh water was found after the eighth location.
Results from 9 Locations
The extent of the
salt water intrusion beneath the river bank is shown below. Wells drilled
within the green zone would encounter brackish water and would not be suitable
water supplies. Wells drilled upstream from the intrusion zone would encounter
fresh water. The initial location for the water well was scrapped because it
fell within the intruded zone. A new location away from the intrusion zone was
found. Our geophysical investigation saved the district tens of thousands of
dollars in exploratory drilling costs.
Zone of Saltwater Intrusion
Seismics and resistivity
are just two of many geophysical techniques offered by
J R Associates. Please contact us to discuss how our services could
benefit you.
J
R Associates, 1886 Emory Street, San Jose, CA 95126
Ph: (408) 293-7390 Fax: (408) 293-0121 Email:
jra@Greatgeophysics.com